It's very interesting that the trough comes with the second
soft communicator. (Liz is talking about a trough that registered
on the readout from her magnetometer which coincided with the second
communicator coming through)
In your report you say that this communication was largely
incoherent, however, I disagree. I heard clearly at the time, and also on the
recording, what I consider to be very important communication. The reason it
feels very important and authentic, is that I think an attempt is being made by
the communicator to really communicate at a high level, verbally. The fact that
the voice is soft and considered suggests a high level communicator who is fine
tuning the process and feeling his way carefully and skilfully. At one point there are two voices in close
proximity, the soft voice and a deeper voice, as though in communication
together, the soft voice urging the deeper voice to say something like 'hello'.
This suggests to me that the soft communicator is a teacher, or more practised
in this process. This is my transcription of some of what was said:
'It fascinates me
...this closeness...I can feel....it fascinates me. To find the
vibration....it's a fine line....knowing exactly where to put our thoughts
takes a time....to know how to respond. We feel our thoughts form. To give a
version of our thoughts. Stabilise. Stabilise.'
These were some of the key things that were said. I think
they are significant and worth putting into the report, because they suggest
the difficulty in a good communicator stabilising and focussing the thoughts
into words in order to communicate, in our space and vibratory level, and
enjoying the process, like an athlete testing their muscles and practising
skilfully. I feel that this is a communication without too much from your own
mind getting in the way. It feels different from you, separate somehow.
Genuinely experimental.
I get the impression of the delight the communicator feels
at actually feeling present in our space and vibratory level, and aware.
The communication was difficult to hear, but certainly not
incoherent. The bits that I picked up cohered perfectly, as I've indicated
above, into what seems an important attempt to convey the process of spirit
communication, and difficulties in bridging the gap between physical and
non-physical from the clear verbal communication point of view, and without too
much interference from your own mind.
Liz...